A Review of Francis Imbuga’s Aminata

Those who sat for their Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (K.C.S.E.) exams in 2004 recall the set book that went by the name Aminata. Here’s the summary that’s at the back of the book:

“Aminata, a brilliant, diligent and benevolent young lawyer is an acclaimed village celebrity. Yet there are those who will see her only as a woman first and everything else afterwards. To assert her human dignity, she has to passionately resist anachronisms that have warped an otherwise fast changing society.”

Back then, the book seemed like it called for the emancipation of women, equity and the disbanding of outdated cultures that discriminated against women. This included the fact that in the fictional community women could not eat chicken because it was a taboo; women could not become village headmen and they couldn’t inherit land simply because they were women. These are good ideas and I appreciated them back then as I do now. It was just yesterday that I realised the play had another component i.e. the idea of contraception and having small families. Until then I had not thought about it deeply and now I began to connect the dots. As with most women’s rights’ advocacy, access to contraception is a key element. Jumba (the village headman) has a flashback whereby Pastor Ngoya tells his congregation:

“I agree with Reverend Abu-Steiner that every fourth child in every family should be seen as an extra mouth. A mouth to feed, a mouth to stop crying, and a mouth to give medicine to.”

There is the idea that people should not have more than three children: that a fourth child is not a person but a mere burden referred to as a ‘mouth’. On the other hand we have Mulemi who has undergone a vasectomy (never mind he is researching on the possibility of reversing his vasectomy) touting that a smaller family guarantees children’s well-being and allows women to concentrate with their careers and for Aminata’s case, to help other and improve their lives. Sure, but why not make the work place more female friendly such that women are allowed to progress in their careers without being penalised for having families?

The issue here is not that children should not be spaced. It’s that having three children is put across as the ideal and that a fourth child is seen as a burden (just a mouth) as if people do not contribute anything to society. That extra mouth to feed might as well be a future president or the one to discover the cure for a currently incurable disease.

People might be in a position to care of more than three children, maybe eight. Does that mean that the other five are mere mouths? They are human beings who deserve the same treatment as you and I. Finally, shouldn’t there be a policy to guide what kind of literature should be taught in school? That kind of literature should be in line with our national values.

Have any questions? Please feel free to contact me.



  1. The play is quiet anticipating since it exposes all the hardles that women must face in the course of their lives. Imbuga has become a prolific writer indeed in our prominent Africa.

  2. Realy this play z interesting and t talks on thngs tht happened long time ago and things tht ar still happenig in some tribes across africa.
    So, t will change peoples lives.

  3. Francis imbuga has greately contributed the neglection of the BOYS in most of the societies in Africa. Traditionaly Boys are meant to provide security.Hence we shall be continuosily be threatened by terrorists if we follow imbuga’s crude idea.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s